Woody Allies: How Chagga Home Gardens Sustain Insect Pollinators in Northern Tanzania I InformativeBD

Woody plants supporting insect pollinators in Chagga home Gardens, Northern Tanzania

Nanyika Kingazi RPC. Temu, Agnes Sirima, and  Mattias Jonsson, from the different institute of Tanzania. wrote a Reseach Article about, Woody Allies: How Chagga Home Gardens Sustain Insect Pollinators in Northern Tanzania. Entitled, Woody plants supporting insect pollinators in Chagga home Gardens, Northern Tanzania. This research paper published by the Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences | JBES. an open access scholarly research journal on Biodiversity. under the affiliation of the International Network For Natural Sciences| INNSpub. an open access multidisciplinary research journal publisher.

Abstract 

Insects play a great role in the pollination of flowers in many agricultural systems, and they rely on floral resources for their survival. However, a significant decline and extinction of these crucial insects have been witnessed globally as a result of fragmentation and/or loss of their habitat such as floral resources using data from the Chagga home garden (CHGs), we aimed at (1) examining the composition and species richness of pollinator forage plants in the CHGs, (2) determining how elevation affects the diversity of pollinator forage species in CHG, (3) determining the temporal availability of pollinator forage plants in the CHGs, (4) determining the pollinator groups foraging on the plants in the CHGs, (5) determining the type of floral rewards for the insect pollinators in CHGs. It was observed that: (1)of the 302 wood species in the CHGs, 293 (97%) from 62 families were pollinator forage of which 170 species (58.02%) were trees while 123 species (41.98%) were shrubs; (2) pollinator forage species diversity decreased with increase in elevation gradient; (3) Flowering of the pollinator forage plants was spread throughout the year; (4) Bees were the most dominant group of plant visitors, visiting about 93% of the plants; (5) the majority of plants provided both pollen and nectar to insect pollinators. The results from this study suggest that traditional agroforestry systems such as Chagga home gardens can contribute to increasing the spatial and temporal availability of diverse floral resources for insect pollinators.

Submit your article to JBES Journal

Read moreHealing from theIslands: Hypoglycemic Power of Cagayan’s Endemic Flora | InformativeBD

Introduction

The importance of pollinators' protection is underscored by the fact that they are essential for pollination of the majority of the world's wild flowering plants (Ollerton et al., 2011) and 75% of crop species (Klein et al., 2007). With regard to crop pollination, understanding factors influencing pollinator populations in farmlands is critical in designing conservation strategies that ensure their longtime survival in agricultural landscapes (Timberlake & Vaughan, 2019).

Insect pollinators are the main pollinator group in agricultural areas and their population is affected by several factors including the availability of floral resources (nectar and pollen) and nesting sites in farmlands (Fowler et al., 2016). One way to ensure the availability of floral and nesting resources for insect pollinators in agricultural areas is by integrating trees and shrubs in farmlands (Bentrup et al., 2019; Centeno-Alvarado et al., 2023). The trees and shrubs in farmlands provide nesting sites and ensure floral resources availability for insect pollinators even when crops are not in bloom (Lowe et al., 2021). However, this depends on whether the integrated trees and shrubs species are suitable for insect pollinators such as supplying food resources in terms of pollen, nectar, or both as well as nest sites.

The Chagga home gardens in Tanzania are one of the agricultural land use systems whereby farmers integrate trees and shrubs with crops and livestock in the same unit of land (Mbeyale &mcharo, 2022). The trees and shrubs in Chagga home gardens are either retained or planted for different purposes such as providing shade to the crops, especially bananas and coffee, fodder, live fences, and fruits (Soini, 2005). According to Hemp (2005), the Chagga home gardens maintain a high diversity of plants with over 500 plant species (including wood and herbaceous plants). However, despite of the high floral diversity of Chagga home gardens, there is little information concerning their potential in supplying floral and nesting resources to insect pollinators. Previous studies such as Arnold et al. (2021), Sawe et al.

(2020), and Elisante et al. (2019) focused on assessing the pollination service of insect pollinator communities in the Chagga home garden and not their ecological habitat (floral resources and nesting sites).

The diversity of pollinator forage plants in the landscape reflects the continuous supply of floral resources from different plant species and hence encourages the insect pollinators to remain on site (Mensah et al., 2017a). This is because trees and shrub species differ in flowering time and duration hence due to their intermittently flowering, they provide floral resources for insect visitors throughout the year (Torne-́Noguera et al., 2014). Also, floral availability to insect pollinators in the landscape depends on the flowering time and spatial distribution of pollinator forage plants in the landscapes. In the Chagga home garden, farmers play a great role in determining the species composition in their garden since they plant or retain species based on their preferences and needs (Fernandes et al., 1985). However environmental factors such as elevation affects the composition of plant species in the landscape (Malizia et al., 2020).

This paper aimed at quantifying the availability of forage resources to insect pollinators in CHGs. A survey was carried out in CHGs to: (1) examine the composition and species richness of pollinator forage plants; (2) determine how elevation affects the diversity of pollinator forage species in CHG; (3) determine the temporal availability of pollinator forage plants in CHG, (4) determine the pollinator groups foraging on the pollinator forage species in CHGs (5) determine the type of floral rewards among insect pollinators forage species in CHGs. The results from this study are a crucial part of formulating efficiency policies, plans, and strategies to manage and conserve insect pollinators in agricultural landscapes in Tanzania.

Reference

Appelhans T, Mwangomo E, Otte I, Detsch F, Nauss T, Hemp A. 2016. Eco-meteorological characteristics of the southern slopes of Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. International Journal of Climatology 36(9), 3245-3258. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4552

Arnold SEJ, Elisante F, Mkenda PA, Tembo YLB, Ndakidemi PA, Gurr GM, Darbyshire IA, Belmain SR, Stevenson PC. 2021. Beneficial insects are associated with botanically rich margins with trees on small farms. Scientific Reports 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94536-3

Bentrup G, Hopwood J, Adamson NL, Vaughan M. 2019. Temperate Agroforestry Systems and Insect Pollinators : A Review. Forests 10, 1-12.

Blüthgen N, Klein AM. 2011. Functional complementarity and specialisation: The role of biodiversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Basic and Applied Ecology 12(4), 282-291.

Brokaw J. 2013. Pollinator Habitat Availability and Diversity in Various Tropical Agroforestry Management Systems of Coffea arabica in Santa Clara, Chiriqui 1-27.

Centeno-Alvarado D, Ariadna Valentina L, Xavier A. 2023. Fostering pollination through agroforestry : A global review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 351, 108478.

Di Pasquale G, Salignon M, Le Conte Y, Belzunces LP, Decourtye A, Kretzschmar A, Suchail S, Brunet JL, Alaux C. 2013. Influence of Pollen Nutrition on Honey Bee Health: Do Pollen Quality and Diversity Matter. PLoS ONE 8(8), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072016

Elisante F, Ndakidemi PA, Arnold SEJ, Belmain SR, Gurr GM, Darbyshire I, Xie G, Tumbo J, Stevenson PC. 2019. Enhancing knowledge among smallholders on pollinators and supporting field margins for sustainable food security. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.07.004

Fernandes ECM, Oktingati A, Maghembe J. 1985. The Chagga homegardens: A multistoried agroforestry cropping system on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Northern Tanzania). Agroforestry Systems 2(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131267

Fowler RE, Rotheray EL, Goulson D. 2016. Floral abundance and resource quality influence pollinator choice 481-494.

Grundel R, Jean RP, Frohnapple KJ, Glowacki GA, Scott PE, Pavlovic NB. 2010. Floral and nesting resources, habitat structure and fire influence bee distribution across an open-forest gradient. Ecological Applications 20(6), 1678-1692.

Hemp A. 2005. The Banana Forests of Kilimanjaro : Biodiversity and Conservation of the Chagga Homegardens. Biodiversity and Conservation 15(2006), 1193-1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8

Hülsmann M, von Wehrden H, Klein AM, Leonhardt SD. 2015. Plant diversity and composition compensate for negative effects of urbanization on foraging bumble bees. Apidologie 46(6), 760-770.

Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 274(1608), 303-313.

Lowe EB, Groves R, Gratton C. 2021. Impacts of field-edge flower plantings on pollinator conservation and ecosystem service delivery- A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 310, 107290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107290

Malizia A, Blundo C, Carilla J, Acosta OO, Cuesta F, Duque A, Aguirre N, Aguirre Z, Ataroff M, Baez S, Calderón-Loor M, Cayola L, Cayuela L, Ceballos S, Cedillo H, Ríos WF, Feeley KJ, Fuentes AF, Gámez Álvarez LE, Young KR. 2020. Elevation and latitude drives structure and tree species composition in Andean forests: Results from a large-scale plot network. PLoS ONE 15(4), 1-18.

Mbeyale GE, mcharo N. 2022. Institutional and land use dynamics of Chagga homegardens in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation 91(1), 101-119.

Mensah S, Veldtman R, Seifert T. 2017a. Potential supply of floral resources to managed honey bees in natural mistbelt forests. Journal of Environmental Management 189, 160-167.

Mensah S, Veldtman R, Seifert T. 2017b. Potential supply of floral resources to managed honey bees in natural mistbelt forests. Journal of Environmental Management 189, 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.033

Ollerton J. 2017. Pollinator Diversity: Distribution, Ecological Function, and Conservation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48, 353-376. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022919

Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals. Oikos 120(3), 321-326.

Onyango P, Nyunja R, Sikolia SF, Opande G. 2019. Seasonal Availability and Floral Calendar of Apis mellifera Nectar and Pollen forage in Eastern Mau 7(1), 88-97.

Patel V, Pauli N, Biggs E, Barbour L, Boruff B. 2021. Why bees are critical for achieving sustainable development. Ambio 50(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01333-9

Plascencia M, Philpott SM. 2017. Floral abundance, richness, and spatial distribution drive urban garden bee communities. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00074853170

Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S. 2005. Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecological Entomology  30, 78-85.

Røhr PC, Killingtveit Å. 2003. Rainfall distribution on the slopes of Mt Kilimanjaro. Hydrological Sciences Journal 48(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.1.65.43483

Rollin O, Bretagnolle V, Decourtye A, Aptel J, Michel N, Vaissière BE, Henry M. 2013. Differences of floral resource use between honey bees and wild bees in an intensive farming system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 179(2013), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.07.007

Sawe T, Eldegard K, Totland Ø, Macrice S, Nielsen A. 2020. Enhancing pollination is more effective than increased conventional agriculture inputs for improving watermelon yields. Ecology and Evolution 10(12), 5343-5353. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6278

Soini E. 2005. Changing livelihoods on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: Challenges and opportunities in the Chagga homegarden system. Agroforestry Systems 64, 157-167.

Taki H, Yamaura Y, Okabe K, Maeto K. 2011. Plantation vs. natural forest: Matrix quality determines pollinator abundance in crop fields. Scientific Reports 1, 1–4.

Timberlake TP, Vaughan IP. 2019. Phenology of farmland floral resources reveals seasonal gaps in nectar availability for bumblebees. Journal of Applied Ecology 56, 1585-1596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365

Torne-́Noguera A, Rodrigo A, Arnan X, Osorio S, Barril-Graells H, Da Rocha-Filho LC, Bosch J. 2014. Determinants of spatial distribution in a bee community: Nesting resources, flower resources and body size. PLoS ONE 9(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097255

Waykar B, Baviskar RK. 2015. Diversity of bee foraging flora and floral calendar of Paithan taluka of Aurangabad District (Maharashtra), India. Journal of Applied Horticulture 17(2), 155-159. https://doi. org/10.37855/jah.2015.v17i02.29

Article sourceWoody plants supportinginsect pollinators in Chagga home Gardens, Northern Tanzania 


0 comments: