Veenayohini Kumaresan, and Ganesh Punamalai, from the institute
of India. wrote a research article about, Isolation and Characterization of
Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria from Human Saliva. Entitled, Isolation and
Characterization of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria from Human Saliva. This
research paper published by the International Journal of Biosciences (IJB). an
open access scholarly research journal on Biosciences. under the affiliation of
the International Network For Natural Sciences | INNSpub. an open
access multidisciplinary research journal publisher.
Abstract
Probiotics, which are
non-pathogenic microorganisms, interact with the gastrointestinal microbiota
and offer various health benefits. These include boosting the host’s immune
response, acting as antiallergic agents, and exhibiting antimicrobial,
anti-cancer, and anti-inflammatory properties. Probiotics are also capable of
restoring the disrupted microbiome in a dysbiotic gut. While they can be
isolated from different environments, it is often recommended that probiotics
intended for human use should be sourced from human origins. The present study
shows the successful isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from saliva. The lactic acid bacteria were isolated from the collected saliva
samples using MRS medium. The isolated bacterial strains were tested for
hemolytic activity to verify their non-pathogenic nature. Further, the strains
were partially identified by biochemical and microscopic observations;
afterwards, the bacterial isolates, which showed non-hemolytic, were tested for
their resistance potential against the standard antibiotics. The observed
result shows that among the 94 individual isolates, only 12 showed non-hemolytic
activity on the blood agar medium. Moreover, the isolated lactic acid bacteria
belong to the Lactobacilli genus. The tested lactic acid bacterial
strains almost showed resistant patterns against many tested antibiotics. The
study’s findings demonstrate the variety of microbial species in human saliva.
Given that these strains are derived from humans, they are likely to exhibit
peak efficiency in applications related to food and pharmaceuticals designed
for human consumption.
Introduction
Probiotic lactic acid bacteria, commonly referred to as LAB, are a group of microorganisms known for their potential health benefits. LABs are frequently found in fermented foods and are considered promising probiotic candidates due to their ability to produce lactic acid and antimicrobial components (Sandi et al., 2019). These bacteria are crucial in regulating intestinal microbial homeostasis, influencing nutrient availability, and modulating local and systemic immune responses (Hossain et al., 2016). The probiotic effects of LAB are attributed to various factors, including their ability to adhere to human cells, exclude pathogenic microbes, and exhibit immunomodulatory and anticarcinogenic activities (Moroeanu et al., 2015). Studies have highlighted the significance of LAB, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, in conferring probiotic benefits (Sjofjan et al., 2021). LAB, such as Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus salivarius, are commonly associated with probiotic properties (Tamang and Lama, 2022). These bacteria are known for enhancing antimicrobial immune protection, thereby aiding in protection against microbial pathogens (Cross, 2002).
Consequently, the search for new bacterial strains with various inherent attributes has emerged to explore their potential utility in treating a wide range of disorders. For example, The application of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 10241 probiotic strain in a burn model has revealed its potential to hinder Pseudomonas aeruginosa's growth by stimulating phagocytosis of this pathogen by tissue phagocytes, reducing apoptosis, and ultimately promoting tissue repair (Valdéz et al., 2005). In recent years, the issue of antibiotic resistance has gained significant attention, leading to increased research on probiotics and their products as possible alternatives.
The use of probiotics can help in the fight against pathogens through various mechanisms, including competitive exclusion, boosting the function of the intestinal barrier, and producing antimicrobial compounds such as peptides (Fijan, 2016; Besser et al., 2019).Several Lactobacillus strains have demonstrated the ability to inhibit the growth of various multi-drug resistant bacterial pathogens, including MRSA. (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), Streptococcus mutans, Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Shigella spp. and Clostridium difficile (Chen et al., 2019; Nami et al., 2019b). Probiotics are present in various environments, including dairy products, fermented foods, and the human body.
However, probiotics derived from humans are commonly
recommended for human use (Sanders, 2008; Kumar et al., 2020). This study aimed
to isolate probiotic LAB strains from saliva of healthy individuals and
evaluate their probiotic potential.
Reference
Azizian K, Taghizadeh
S, Hosseinpour R, Tanomand A, Sheikhsaran E, Alizadeh N, Naghili B, Samadi
Kafil H. 2019. Inhibitory effect of isolated Lactobacillus from oral
cavity against bacterial pathogens and its effect on health promotion. Ars
Pharmaceutical 60, 27–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.30827/ars.v60i1.7943
Besser M, Terberger J,
Weber L, Ghebremedhin B, Naumova EA, Arnold WH. 2019. Impact of probiotics
on pathogen survival in an innovative human plasma biofilm model (hpBIOM).
Journal of Translational Medicine 17, 243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1990-4
Bosch M, Nart J,
Audivert S, Bonachera MA, Alemany AS, Fuentes MC, Cuñé J. 2012. Isolation
and characterization of probiotic strains for improving oral health. Archives
of oral biology, 57(5), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.10.006
Charernjiratragul W,
Bhoopong P, Kantachote D, Jomduang S, Kong-Ngoen R, Nair GB, Vuddhakul V. 2010.
Inhibitory activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from thai fermented food
against pandemic strains of vibrio parahaemolyticus. Journal of Food
Safety 30(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2009.00190.x
Chen CC, Lai CC, Huang
HL, Huang WY, Toh HS, Weng TC. 2019. Antimicrobial activity of
Lactobacillus species against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Front.
Microbiol. 10:789. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.
00789
Cross ML. 2002.
Microbes versus microbes: immune signals generated by probiotic lactobacilli
and their role in protection against microbial pathogens. FEMS Immunology
&Amp; Medical Microbiology 34(4), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2002.tb00632.x
Fijan S. 2016.
“Antimicrobial effect of probiotics against common pathogens,” in Probiotics
and Prebiotics in Human Nutrition and Health, eds V. Rao and L. G. Rao (London:
InTechopen). http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/63141
Halder D, Mandal M,
Chatterjee SS, Pal NK, Mandal S. 2017. Indigenous probiotic Lactobacillus
isolates presenting antibiotic like activity against human pathogenic bacteria.
Biomedicines 5, 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines5020031
Hossain MS, Al‐Bari
MAA, Wahed MII. 2016. Biochemical characterization of probiotics available
in bangladesh. Journal of Scientific Research 8(1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v8i1.25299
Kang MS, Lim HS, Oh JS,
Lim YJ, Wuertz-Kozak K, Harro JM. 2017. Antimicrobial activity
of Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus fermentum against
Staphylococcus aureus. Pathog. Dis. 75, ftx009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx009
Kiliç GB, Karahan AG. 2010.
Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the fecal samples of healthy
humans and patients with dyspepsia, and determination of their pH, bile, and
antibiotic tolerance properties. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and
Biotechnology 18, 220–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000319597
Kook SY, Chung EC, Lee
Y, Lee DW, Kim S. 2019. Isolation and characterization of five novel
probiotic strains from Korean infant and children’s faeces. PLoS One
14:e0223913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223913
Kumar M, Dhaka P, Vijay
D, Vergis J, Mohan V, Kumar A. 2016. Antimicrobial effects of
Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus against
multidrug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. International Journal
of Antimicrobial Agents 48, 265–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.05.014
Kumar R, Sood U, Gupta
V, Singh M, Scaria J, Lal R. 2020. Recent advancements in the development
of modern probiotics for restoring human gut microbiome Dysbiosis. Indian
Journal of Microbiology 60, 12–25. http://dx.doi.org10.1007/s12088-019-00808-y
McFarland, L. 2015.
Probiotics for the primary and secondary prevention of C. difficile infections:
a meta-analysis and systematic review. Antibiotics 4, 160–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics4020160
Moroeanu V, Vamanu E,
Păun G, Neagu E, Ungureanu O, Eremia SAV, Pelinescu D. 2015. Probiotic
strains influence on infant microbiota in the in vitro colonic fermentation
model gis1. Indian Journal of Microbiology 55(4), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0542-8
Nami Y, Vaseghi
Bakhshayesh R, Mohammadzadeh Jalaly H, Lotfi H, Eslami, S, Hejazi MA. 2019b.
Probiotic properties of Enterococcus isolated from artisanal dairy products.
Front. Microbiol 10, 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.
2019.00300
Nguyen T, Brody H,
Radaic A, Kapila Y. 2021. Probiotics for periodontal health—Current
molecular findings. Periodontol. 2000(87), 254–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111
prd.12382
Oh YJ, Jung DS. 2015.
Evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus and Pediococcus strains
isolated from omegisool, a traditionally fermented millet alcoholic beverage in
Korea. LWT Food Sci. Technol 63, 437–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.005
Raman J, Kim J, Choi
KR, Eun H, Yang D, Ko Y,Kim S. 2022. Application of lactic acid bacteria
(lab) in sustainable agriculture: advantages and limitations. International
Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(14), 7784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147784
Sanders ME. 2008.
Probiotics: definition, sources, selection, and uses. Clin. Infect.
Dis. 46, S58–S61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/523341
Sandi S, Miksusanti M,
Sari M, Sahara E, Supriyadi A, Gofar N, Asmak A. 2019. Acid resistance
test of probiotic isolated from silage forage swamp on in vitro digestive
tract. Indonesian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Chemistry 4(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.24845/ijfac.v4.i1.15
Sardana RK, Chhikara N,
Tanwa B, Pangh A. 2018. Dietary impact on esophageal cancer in humans: a
review. Food Funct. 9, 1967–1977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7fo01908d
Sharma P, Tomar SK,
Goswami P, Sangwan V, Singh R. 2014. Antibiotic resistance among
commercially available probiotics. Food Research International 57, 176–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.025
Sjofjan O, Adli DN,
Harahap RP, Jayanegara A, Utama DT, Seruni AP. 2021. The effects of lactic
acid bacteria and yeasts as probiotics on the growth performance, relative
organ weight, blood parameters, and immune responses of broiler: a
meta-analysis. F1000Research 10, 183. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51219.3
Sornplang P,
Piyadeatsoontorn S. 2016. Probiotic isolates from unconventional sources:
a review. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 58, 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40781-016-0108-2
Strahinic I, Busarcevic
M, Pavlica D, Milasin J, Golic N, Topisirovic L. 2007. Molecular and
biochemical characterizations of human oral lactobacilli as putative probiotic
candidates. Oral microbiology and immunology 22(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00331.x
Swenson JM, Facklam RR,
Thornsberry C. 1990. Antimicrobial susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant
Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, and Lactobacillus species. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother 34, 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.34.4.543
Tamang JP, Lama S. 2022.
Probiotic properties of yeasts in traditional fermented foods and beverages.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 132(5),3533-3542. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15467
Terai T, Okumura T,
Imai S, Nakao M, Yamaji, K, Ito M. 2015. Screening of probiotic candidates
in human oral bacteria for the prevention of dental disease. PLoS One 10
:e0128657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128657
Terpou Α, Papadaki A,
Lappa IK, Kachrimanidou V, Bosnea L, Kopsahelis N. 2019. Probiotics in
food systems: significance and emerging strategies towards improved viability
and delivery of enhanced beneficial value. Nutrients, 11(7), 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071591
Tynkkynen S, Singh KV,
Varmanen P. 1998. Vancomycin resistance factor of Lactobacillus rhamnosus
GG in relation to enterococcal vancomycin resistance (van) genes. International
Journal of Food Microbiology 41, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00051-8
Valdéz JC, Peral MC,
Rachid M, Santana M, Perdigón G. 2005. Interference of Lactobacillus
plantarum with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in infected burns: the
potential use of probiotics in wound treatment. Clinical Microbiology and
Infection 11, 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01142.x
Vijayabharathi R,
Palanisamy BD, Manoharan RK, Sathyabama S, Bruntha P, Priyadarisini, VB. 2012.
Screening for probiotic properties of strains isolated from feces of various
human groups. Artic. Journal of Microbiology 50, 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-012-2045-1
Source : Isolation and Characterization of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria from Human Saliva
0 comments:
Post a Comment