Showing posts with label Machine Learning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Machine Learning. Show all posts

Mapping Dindéresso Forest Landscapes with Sentinel-2 and Machine Learning | InformativeBD


Mapping heterogeneous landscapes using sentinel-2 imagery and machine learning algorithms: A case of the Dindéresso classified forestBoalidioa Tankoano,  Dramane Ouedraogo,  Zézouma Sanon, Jérôme T. Yameogo, and Mipro Hien, from the different institute of Burkina Faso. wrote a Reseach Article about, Mapping Dindéresso Forest Landscapes with Sentinel-2 and Machine Learning. Entitled, Mapping heterogeneous landscapes using sentinel-2 imagery and machine learning algorithms: A case of the Dindéresso classified forest. This research paper published by the International Journal of Biosciences (IJB). an open access scholarly research journal on Biosciences. under the affiliation of the International Network For Natural Sciences| INNSpub. an open access multidisciplinary research journal publisher.

Abstract

The anthropization of natural ecosystems has not excluded the domain classified by the State. As a result, the landscape of protected areas such as the Dinderesso Classified Forest is highly heterogeneous. The overall objective was to assess the performance of machine learning algorithms in better mapping the land use classes of the Dinderesso Classified Forest. To do this, a Sentinel-2 image and information collected in the field were used. The Sentinel-2 image was classified using Random Forest and Support Vector Machine algorithms. 850 regions of interest were selected for model training and validation. Random Forest performed best, with a Kappa coefficient of 91.49% compared with 90.17% for Support Vector Machine. The F-score for the Bare land and Agroforestry parks class was the highest (0.98) and the Gallery and Dense Vegetation class had the lowest F-score (0.82). Both algorithms showed high levels of performance, so they are suitable for classifying heterogeneous landscapes. The proportion of the Bare land and Agroforestry parks class was 29.29% compared with 70.71% for the natural formation classes (shrub savannahs, tree savannahs, Gallery, and Dense Vegetation). Given the level of anthropization of the Classified Forest, measures need to be taken to limit this process to conserve biodiversity.

Submit your article to JBES Journal

Read more White Spot Syndrome Virus: A Major Threat to Shrimp Farming in Asia | InformativeBD

Introduction

Burkina Faso, a Sahelian country, is home to major reservoirs of biodiversity in West Africa (Ouoba, 2006; Tankaono et al., 2017; Tiendrebeogo et al., 2019). The State's classified domain, which covers around 14% of the national territory, is the foundation of the national biodiversity conservation policy (Tankaono et al., 2016; Zida et al., 2015). However, human activities such as inappropriate agricultural practices, overpopulation, exploitation, and urban sprawl, combined with the poverty of rural populations, constitute serious threats to this classified State domain (Tankoano et al., 2015; Sanon et al., 2019). According to the latest report on Burkina Faso's forests, around 60% of the country's protected areas are under human occupation (DIFOR, 2007). Between 1990 and 2015, the surface area of plant cover was reduced by around 1% per year (FAO, 2015). One of the main causes of this deforestation of protected areas is agriculture and gold panning (Ouedraogo et al., 2010; Dimobe et al., 2015; Soulama et al., 2015; Zoungrana et al., 2015; Semeki Ngabinzeke et al., 2016). These two main activities lead to the fragmentation of the forest ecosystems in these protected areas (Kabulu et al., 2008; Kpedenou et al., 2016; Tankoano et al., 2016; Sanon et al., 2019). Faced with this situation, monitoring the country's last vestiges of biodiversity is becoming crucial, even imperative, at the risk of witnessing an erosion of national biodiversity. Unfortunately, financial and human resources are lacking.

Most studies concerning vegetation cover mapping in Burkina Faso are based on Landsat satellite images, but very few have used Sentinel-2 images. Nowadays, remote sensing has become a powerful tool for monitoring protected areas. Satellite imagery is commonly used to study the dynamics of land-use units, mutations between land-use units, and the impacts of agricultural activities and logging (JofackSokeng et al., 2016; Gansaonré et al., 2020; Tankoano et al., 2023). These various activities within protected areas lead to a certain het erogeneity in the landscape, which makes it difficult to classify land-use units with a high level of precision.

More and more satellites and classification algorithms are being developed for this purpose. Machine learning algorithms are also being used to classify satellite images. Sentinel-2 images, with their high resolution (10m), make it easier to detect the smallest units in the landscape. Machine learning algorithms enable accurate cartographic results, facilitating timely decision-making by protected area managers. 

However, the application of machine learning algorithms in classifying heterogeneous ecosystems has been explored little. Their contribution to improved accuracy, hence the reduction of interclass confusion, therefore needs to be explored in highly heterogeneous savannah ecosystems.

This study aims to evaluate the ability of machine learning algorithms to classify a heterogeneous landscape using a sentinel-2 image with high accuracy. Specifically, the aim was to (i) map the Dinderesso Classified Forest using a Sentinel-2 image and machine learning ; (ii) assess the ability of each two machine learning algorithms (RF and SVM) to better classify the land use/land cover within Dinderesso classified forest.

Reference

Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Chowdhury MS. 2024. Comparison of accuracy and reliability of random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network and maximum likelihood met hod in land use/cover classification of urban set ting. Environmental Challenges 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100800

Congalton R. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 37, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B

Cracknell MJ, Reading AM. 2014. Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information. Comput. Geosci. 63, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.008

Dagne SS, Hirpha HH, Tekoye AT, Dessie YB, Endeshaw AA. 2023. Fusion of sentinel-1 SAR and sentinel-2 MSI data for accurate urban land use-land cover classification in Gondar City, Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research 12(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-023-00324-5

Diallo H, Bamba I, Barima YSS, Visser M, Ballo A, Mama A, Vranken I, Maïga M, Bogaert J. 2011. Effet s combinés du climat et  des pressions anthropiques sur la dynamique évolutive de la végétation d’une zone protégée du Mali (Réserve de Fina, Boucle du Baoulé). Sécheresse 22(3), 97-107. DOI: 10.1684/sec.2011.0306

Dimobe K, Ouédraogo A, Soma S, Goet ze D, Porembski S, Thiombiano A. 2015. Identification of driving factors of land degradation and deforestation in the Wildlife Reserve of Bontioli (Burkina Faso, West Africa). Global Ecology and Conservation 4, 559-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.006

Foody G. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 80, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4

Geymen A, Baz I. 2008. The potential of remote sensing for monitoring land cover changes and effects on physical geography in the area of Kayisdagi mountain and its surroundings (Istanbul). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 140(3), 33-42. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-007-9844-6

Gholamy A, Kreinovich V, Kosheleva O. 2018. Why 70/30 or 80/20 relation between training and testing sets: A pedagogical explanation. Dep. Tech. Rep. 1209, 1–6.

Inoussa MM, Mahamane A, Mbow C, Saâdou M, Yvonne B. 2011. Dynamique spatio-temporelle des forêts claires dans le Parc national du W du Niger (Afrique de l’Ouest). Sécheresse 22(3), 97-107. DOI: 10.1684/sec.2011.0305

Islami FA, Tarigan SD, Wahjunie ED, Dasanto BD. 2022. Accuracy assessment of land use change analysis using Google Earth in Sadar Watershed Mojokerto Regency. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 950, 012091. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/950/1/012091

Kabba STV, Li J. 2011. Analysis of land use and land cover changes, and their ecological implication in Wuhan, China. Journal of Geography and Geology 3, 104-118.

Liu C, Frazier P, Kumar L. 2007. Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ. 107, 606–616.

Mbow C. 2009. Potentiel et  dynamique des stocks de carbone des savanes soudaniennes et  soudano-guinéennes du Sénégal. Thèse de Doctorat d’Et at, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Sénégal, 319p.

N’Da DH, N’Guessan EK, Wadja ME, Affian K. 2008. Apport de la télédétection au suivi de la déforestation dans le parc national de la Marahoué (Côte d’Ivoire). Télédétection 8(1), 17-34.

Nery T, Sadler R, Solis-Aulestia M, White B, Polyakov M, Chalak M. 2016. Comparing supervised algorithms in land use and land cover classification of a Landsat time-series. Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp, 5165–5168.

Ouédraogo I, Tigabu M, Savadogo P, Compaoré H, Oden PC, Ouadba JM. 2010. Land cover change and its relation with population dynamics in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Land Degradation and Development 21, 453-462.

Pointius RG Jr. 2000. Quantification error versus location in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66(8), 1011-1016.

Rahman A, Abdullah HM, Tanzir MT, Hossain MJ, Khan BM, Miah MG, Islam I. 2020. Performance of different machine learning algorithms on satellite image classification in rural and urban set up. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100410

Smits P, Dellepaine S, Schowengerdt R. 1999. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land cover mapping: a review and a proposal for a cost-based approach. Int. J. Remote Sen. 20, 1461–1486.

Soulama S, Kadeba A, Nacoulma BMI, Traoré S, Bachmann Y, Thiombiano A. 2015. Impact des activités anthropiques sur la dynamique de la végétation de la réserve partielle de faune de Pama et  de ses périphéries (sud-est du Burkina Faso) dans un contexte de variabilité climatique. Journal of Applied Biosciences 87, 8047-8064.

Tabopda WG, Huynh F. 2009. Caractérisation et  suivi du recul des ligneux dans les aires protégées au Nord du Cameroun: analyse par télédétection spatiale dans la réserve forestière de Kalfou. Journées d’animation scientifique (JAS09) de l’AUF, Alger, 11p.

Tankoano B, Hien M, N’Da DH, Sanon Z, Akpa YL, Jofack Sokeng V-C, Somda I. 2016. Cartographie de la dynamique du couvert végétal du Parc National des Deux Balé à l’Ouest du Burkina Faso. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 16, 837-846.

Tankoano B, Hien M, Sanon Z, Dibi NH, Yameogo TJ, Somda I. 2015. Dynamique spatio-temporelle des savanes boisées de la Forêt Classée de Tiogo au Burkina Faso. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 9(4), 1983-2000.

Tiendrebeogo M, Bamna D, Pedabga A, Goungounga J. 2019. Fiche descriptive Ramsar, Burkina Faso, Complexe d’Aires Protégées Pô-Nazinga-Sissili. Ramsar. Available at: https://rsis.ramsar.org/fr/ris/2366?language=fr

SourceMapping heterogeneous landscapes using sentinel-2 imagery and machine learning algorithms: A case ofthe Dindéresso classified forest 


Machine Learning Predicts Thrips Occurrence in Tomatoes Under Weather Variations | InformativeBD

Predictive Analysis of Occurrence of Thrips in Tomato Subject to Weather Parameters Using Machine Learning Techniques

Satish Kumar Yadav,  from the institute of India. D. Pawar, from the institute of India. Latika Yadav , from the institute of India. and Saurabh Tripathi, from the institute of India. wrote a Research Article about, Machine Learning Predicts Thrips Occurrence in Tomatoes Under Weather Variations. Entitled, Predictive Analysis of Occurrence of Thrips in Tomato Subject to Weather Parameters Using Machine Learning Techniques. This research paper published by the International Journal of Biosciences (IJB).  an open access scholarly research journal on Biosciences. under the affiliation of the International Network For Natural Sciences | INNSpub. an open access multidisciplinary research journal publisher.

Abstract

Thrips (Thripidae) on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at Rajendranagar, Andhra Pradesh, India is modelled based on field data sets generated during six kharif seasons [2011-18]. The weather variables considered are maximum & minimum temperature (MaxT & MinT) (0C), morning and evening humidity (RHM & RHE) (%), sunshine hours (SS) (hr/d), wind velocity (Wind) (km/hr), total rainfall (RF) (mm) and rainy days (RD). Thrips incidence was higher during 2012 and lowest in 2014. Correlation analyses significant positive influence of maximum temperature and negative influence of wind of one lags, RHM both current and one lags, rainfall one lag of negative influence on thrips. Machine learning techniques namelyAn empirical comparison of the above models [support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF) and the other statistical models e.g., multiple linear regression (MLR), ridge regression (RR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and elastic net (EN)] is based on root mean square error (RMSE). It is observed that, for thrips, the RMSE values of RF and LASSO are less as compared to other competing models. Diebold-Mariano (D-M) test was applied for comparison of forecasting performance among the applied models. It is observed that, predictive accuracy of RF and LASSO is higher than that of other models.

Submit your article to IJB Journal

Read morePost-Harvest Conservation Methods for Solenostemon rotundifolius Seedlings: An EffectivenessStudy | InformativeBD

Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most popular produced and extensively consumed vegetable crops in the world (Grandillo et al., 1999). It is one of the most important vegetable crops in India that can be eaten raw in salads or as an ingredient in many dishes and in drinks (Alam et al., 2007). Tomatoes and tomato-based foods provide a wide variety of nutrients and many health-related benefits to the body. In regions where it is being cultivated and consumed, it constitutes a very essential part of people’s diet. Tomatoes production accounts for about 4.8 million hectares of harvested land area globally with an estimated production of 165 million tonnes (FAOSTAT, 2017). China leads world tomato production with about 50 million tonnes followed by India with 17.8 million tonnes. Tomato production can serve as a source of income for most rural and peri-urban producers in most developing countries. Despite all the numerous benefits from the crop, many challenges are making its production unprofitable in most developing countries, especially those in Africa. The challenges faced by producers are seen either in production, post-harvest, marketing or a combination of any of them. The purpose of this paper is to look at the postharvest challenges that result in losses and recommend some low-cost intermediate technologies needed to remedy the situation. Accounting for about 8.23% of the total vegetable production in the country. Tremendous progress has been made in tomato production during the past four and half decades. At present, India is the fourth largest producer of tomato, accounting for 6.8% of the world production and the second largest in terms of acreage, accounting for 11.9% of area under tomato in the world. Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) is widely distributed and has caused serious losses in the yield of this and many other crops in Australia, India, Nepal, China, Thailand, and USA. Early infections cause the most severe damage and can lead to total crop loss. Epidemics of insect-transmitted plant viruses in agricultural ecosystems require the interaction of 3 basic components: the host plant of the virus, the insect vector and the plant pathogenic virus. While this triad sounds quite straight forward, the relationships and interactions occurring between and among the basic triad components and the environment are complex and dynamic, frequently defying complete understanding by scientists and agricultural practitioners worldwide. Many plant viruses are transmitted by arthropod vectors (Nault, 1997). TSWV, the type species of the genus Tospovirus, family Bunyaviridae (Murphy et al., 1995), is exclusively transmitted by several thrips species in a propagative manner (German et al., 1992; Ammar, 1994; Goldbach and Peters, 1994). Tomatoes are susceptible to more than 200 diseases. Important achievements in chemical, biological, cultural and genetic control methods have greatly reduced economic losses and sometimes have eliminated them. Viral diseases are a special case since they cannot be controlled by chemical treatments. Crop protection must then rely on genetic resistance or on disease avoidance. TSWV was first reported in India in tomato in 1964 (Todd et al., 1975). The occurrence of TSWV on a legume in India was first recorded in 1968 (Reddy et al., 1968). Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) cause serious problems in the cultivation of a wide range of greenhouse and field crops. They create major damage on plants by causing reduction in plant growth, deformation of plant organs, and cosmetic damage in the form of silver scars on leaves and flowers. Thrips cause direct damage during feeding, plants should be released by breaking the leaf, fountain and fruits cells, leaving behind silvery patches and fruit sores to reduce plant yields and tomato market shortage (Riley and Pappu, 2004; Staford et al., 2011). And these are dependent on weather conditions (Verhage et al., 2017; Harvey et al., 2018). Thus, there is a need for the development of predictive models for the incidence of pests and diseases that can improve the interpretation of the crop cycle according to the weather, incorporating weather-soil-plant factors (Malau et al., 2018; Badnakhe et al., 2018). Machine learning is a method that works with data analysis and seeks to automate the construction of analytical models (Shekoofa et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016). It is a field of computer science that works with the recognition of patterns using computational learning theory in artificial intelligence (Sahoo et al., 2017). Machine learning algorithms are very promising for faster, more dependent variables and the meteorological elements are the independent variables of the models. Elastic Net (EN), a penalized variable selection approach that combines both ridge penalty and LASSO penalty. Different forecasting techniques e.g., Multiple Linear Regression (MLR); K Neighbors Regressor (KNN); Random Forest Regressor (RFT), and Artificial Neural Networks– Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), EN, LASSO are applied. The ridge method of MLR is utilized. This method avoids poor conditioning of the matrix of the repressor variables, controlling the inflation and the general instability found in least squares estimators. Ridge avoids the multicollinearity problem without having to exclude repressor variables, so it has no information loss.

Reference

Alam T, Tanweer G, Goyal GK. 2007. Stewart Postharvest Review, Packaging and storage of tomato puree and paste. Research article. 3(5), 1-8.

Ammar ED. 1994. Propagative transmission of plant and animal viruses by insects: factors affecting vector specificity and competence. Advances in Disease Vector Research 10, 289-331.

Badnakhe MR, Durbha SS, Jagarlapudi A, Gade RM. 2018. Evaluation of Citrus Gummosis disease dynamics and predictions with weather and inversion-based leaf optical model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 155, 130-141.

Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32.

Chatterje S, Hadi AS. 2012. Regression Analysis by Example, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.

Chowdappa P. 2010. Impact of climate change on fungal diseases of Horticultural crops: In: Challenges of climate change-Indian Horticulture (Eds.: H.P. Singh, J.P. Singh and S.S. Lal).  Westville publishing house, New Delhi. 144-15.

Diebold FX, Mariano RS. 1995. Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13, 253-263.

Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. 2004. Least angle regression. The Annals of Statistics. 32, 407–499.

FAOSTAT 2017. Global tomato production. Rome, FAO.

German TL, Ullman DE, Moyer JW. 1992. Tospoviruses: diagnosis, molecular biology, phylogeny, and vector relationships. Annual Review of Phytopathology 30, 315–348.

German TL, Ullman DE, Moyerm JW. 1992. Tospoviruses: diagnosis, molecular biology, phylogeny, and vector relationships. Annual Review of Phytopathology 30, 315–348.

Goldbach R, Peters D. 1994. Possible cause of the emergence of tospovirus diseases. Seminars in Virology 5, 113–120.

Grandillo S, Zamir D, Tanksley SD. 1999. Genetic improvement of processing     tomatoes: A 20 years perspective. Euphytica. 110, 85–97.

Harvey CA, Saborio-Rodríguez M, Martinez-Rodríguez MR, Viguera B, Chain-Guadarrama A. 2018. Climate change impacts and adaptation among smallholder farmers in Central America. Agriculture and Food Security 7(1), 1–20.

Li YH, Xu JY, Tao L, Li XF, Li S, Zeng X, Prot SVM.-2016. A web-server for machine learning prediction of protein functional families from sequence irrespective of similarity. PloS one. 11(8), e0155290.

Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News. 2, 18-22.

Malau S, Lumbanraja P, Pandiangan S, Tarigan JR, Tindaon F. 2018. Performance of Coffea arabica L In Changing Climate of North Sumatra of Indonesia. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 49(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.2478/sab-2018-0041.

Murphy FA, Fauquet CM, Bishop PHL. Ghabrial SA, Jarvis AW, Martelli GP, Mayo MA, Summers MD. 1995. Virus taxonomy. Sixth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Archives of Virology (10), 313–314.

Nault LR. 1997. Arthropod transmission of plant viruses: a new synthesis. Annals of Entomological Society of America 90, 521–541.

Paul RK, Vennila S, Singh N, Chandra P, Yadav SK, Sharma OP, Sharma V, K Nisar S, Bhat MN, Rao MS, Prabhakar M. 2018. Seasonal Dynamics of Sterility Mosaic of Pigeonpea and its Prediction using Statistical Models for Banaskantha Region of Gujarat, India. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 72, 213-223.

Reddy M, Reddy DVR, Appa Rao A. 1968. A new record of virus disease on peanut. Plant Disease Reporter 52, 494-5.

Riley D, Pappu H. 2004. Tactics for management of thrips (Tysanoptera: Tripidae) and Tomato spotted wilt virus in tomato. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 1648–1658.

Sahoo S, Ta R, Elliott J, Foster I. 2017. Machine learning algorithms for modeling groundwater level changes in agricultural regions of the US. Water Resources Research 53(5), 3878–3895.

Sakimura K. 1961. Field observations on the thrips vector species of the tomato spotted wilt virus in the San Pablo area, California. Plant Disease Reporter 45, 772-776.

Shekoofa A, Emam Y, Shekoufa N, Ebrahimi M, Ebrahimie E. 2014. Determining the most important physiological and agronomic traits contributing to maize grain yield through machine learning algorithms: a new avenue in intelligent agriculture. PloS one.  9(5), e97288.

Staford CA, Walker GP, Ullman DE. 2011. Infection with a plant virus modifes vector feeding behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 9350–9355, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100773108.

Tibshirani R. 1996. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 58(B), 267–288.

Todd JM, Ponniah S, Subramanyam CP. 1975. First record of tomato spotted wilt virus from Nilgiris in India. Madras Agricultural Journal 2, 162-3.

Vapnik VN. 2000. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer- Verlag, New York.

Verhage FYF, Anten NPR, Sentelhas PC. 2017. Carbon dioxide fertilization off sets negative impacts of climate change on Arabica coffee yield in Brazil. Clim Chang 144(4), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.Journalpone.0211508.

Zou H, Hastie T. 2005. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. B67 (2), 301–320.

Source Predictive Analysis of Occurrence of Thrips in Tomato Subject to Weather Parameters Using Machine Learning Techniques