Gerlie B. Hardy, from
the institute of Philippines. wrote a Research article about, Coastal
Livelihoods and Resource Use: Community Perspectives from San Jose, Gonzaga. entitled,
Socio-economic component, coastal resource use and perception, and
participation of the coastal communities/fishing households in San Jose,
Gonzaga, Cagayan. This research paper published by the International Journal of Biosciences | IJB. an open access scholarly research journal on Biosciences.
under the affiliation of the International Network For Natural Sciences|
INNSpub. an open access multidisciplinary research journal publisher.
Abstract
The study generally
identified and analyzed the socio-economic status, coastal resource use, and
perception and community participation of coastal communities of the community
of San Jose in Gonzaga, Cagayan. The research conducted interviews based on
questionnaires and used a descriptive survey as the research design. Thirty-seven
respondents were interviewed and most of them are members of San Jose Fisher
folk Association. It revealed that most have low levels of education, with
fishing as the main source of income for the residents. This dominance of
fishing is a major economic factor contributing to the income of the community.
The fishing activities are not only limited to marine waters but also to
estuary areas where mangroves thrive. Meanwhile, due to climate change and
resource-dependent communities, today, benefits derived from coastal
environments are limited since there were some changes observed in fishing
ground location, the volume of catch, size of fish, coral reef, mangroves, and
beaches. Generally, it implies that a full understanding of socio-economic characteristics,
coastal resource use, and perception of the coastal community of Barangay San
Jose play important roles in the coastal resource restoration and management
plans. Also, these help to understand the underlying causes of degradation and
interventions needed in the community.
Read more : Bee Efficiency in Action: Chalicodoma cincta Pollination of Pigeon Pea in Chad | InformativeBD
Introduction
Mangrove forest is
considered a highly productive ecosystem that offers important economic and
ecological goods and services (Zakaria and Rajpar, 2015). It is a natural
barrier to reduce the devastating impact of natural disasters such as tsunamis,
typhoons, and storm surges. Also, it provides breeding and nursing grounds for
marine and pelagic species and helps stabilize shorelines. Other ecological
benefits are providing medicine, food, building materials for local
communities, and fuel. In the country, the current estimates of mangrove forest
are less than half of what it once was and this remaining is in a degraded
condition. These forests are the least concerned and often over-utilized by human
communities (Haritha et al., 2017) and the continued decline of the forest is
caused by conversion to aquaculture, agriculture, tourism, urban development,
and deforestation. Mangrove forest has been declining at a faster rate as
compared to coral reefs and inland tropical forests.
In Cagayan, there are
3,967.9 hectares of mangrove area which are distributed throughout the
municipalities of Aparri, Calayan, Abulug, Buguey, Gonzaga, Claveria, Sta. Ana,
Pamplona, Santa Teresita, and Sanchez Mira (EQ. Pasion; BT. Tumaliuan, 2015).
Mangrove area harbors at least 14 species of true mangrove and this is 35% of
the country’s mangrove plant species. Particularly, in Gonzaga, the status of
the mangrove forest is poor with an average of 25% living mangrove. Most of the
areas manifested heavy erosion, severe cutting, and siltation particularly
observed in Barangays San Jose and Caroan, where the largest tracts of mangrove
forest in the municipality are located (Pasion and Tumaliuan, 2015). The
degradation of mangrove forests possesses negative consequences on ecology,
disaster preparation and control, livelihood, biodiversity, livelihood, and the
living condition of people in coastal areas. With this, restoration and
conservation of mangrove forests in these coastal communities are essential.
According to Lewis (2009), successful mangrove forest restoration requires
careful analyses of a number of factors in advance of attempting actual
restoration. A wide variety of restoration techniques have been developed;
however, the most critical point is to fit restoration efforts with the local
biological and physical settings, selecting the right location and the right
species (Lavieren et al., 2012). The ecological aspects of mangrove restoration
must also be coupled with considering the local community that has specific
socio-economic conditions. A full understanding of the socio-economic status of
the community can help the goal of restoration and can guide the management
plans of the study. Interviews with local people may help to understand what
are the underlying causes of degradation-even to researchers from exact
sciences these socio-economic surveys are very important, as they are the only
source of retrospective information. The study identified and analyzed the socio-economic
status and ecological status of coastal communities of Barangay San Jose in
Gonzaga, Cagayan, Philippines, and their dependency on the floral and faunal
resources of water. This baseline and ecological information are a basic and
prerequisite tool that can be incorporated into a resource management context
by recommending interventions that address the underlying factors behind
coastal resource degradation.
Reference
Cinner J. 2000.
“Socioeconomic influences on coastal resource use in Mahahual, Mexico (Master’s
thesis, University of Rhode Island).
Eaton E, Burton H,
Steer MD, Belle EMS. 2009. “A Socio-economic study of mangrove perceptions
and Management in the bay of Antsiranana: Ambalisakely, Abalibabe,
Andohazompona, Ampasirikely and Antsisikala,” Frontier Madagascar Environmental
Research Report Society for Environmental Exploration, UK.
Haritha M, Nisha KAS,
Sekhar PR. 2017. “A study on mangrove ecology and socio-economic status of
fishing communities in coringa region of East Godavari district, Andhra
Pradesh, India,” International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies,
IV 1, pp. 01-04,
Lavieren HV, Spalding
M, Alongi D, Kainuma M, Godt MC, Adeel Z. 2012. “Securing the Future of
Mangroves, A Policy Brief. United Nations University. Institute for Water,
Environmental and Health, Hamilton, Canada pp. 1-53.
Lewis RR. 2009.
“Methods and criteria for successful mangrove forest restoration. Coastal
Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach,” Elsevier pp. 787-800,
Martinuzzi S, Gould WA,
Lugo AE, Medina E. 2009. “Conversion and Recovery of Puerto Rican
mangroves: years of change,” Forest Ecology and Management, CCLVII(1), pp.75-84,
Pacris FA, Jr Bayani
GU, Baloloy MV. 2020. Bio-physical and chemical assessment of Mangrove
waters in Gonzaga, Cagayan, International Journal of Biosciences XVI(6), pp.
241-248.
Pasion EQ, Tumaliuan BT. 2015.
“State of the Mangroves in Cagayan,” Mangrove Proceedings pp. 55-58.
Tietze U. 2004.
“Technical and socio-economic characteristics of small-scale coastal fishing
communities, and opportunities for poverty alleviation and empowerment,” FAO
Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1111. Rome, Italy.
Zakaria M., Rajpar M. 2015.
“Assessing the fauna diversity of Marudu Bay mangrove forest, Sabah, Malaysia,
for future Conservation,” Diversity, VII 2, pp. 137-148,







0 comments:
Post a Comment