Laurant Nyamsi-Moussian
, Gordon N. Ajonina , Guillaume L. Essomè-Koum , Ernest F. Kottè-Mapoko ,
Boubakary , Alphonse Konango-Samè , Vanessa M. Ngo-Massou, Jean M. Emanè , and
Ndongo Din, from the different institute of the Cameroon. wrote a research
article about, Standing Biomass and Litter-Fall Dynamics in Reforested
Mangroves of Douala-Edea National Park, Cameroon. entitled, Assessment of
standing biomass and litter-fall production in reforested mangrove stands
within Douala-Edea National Park (Cameroon). This research paper published by
the Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES). an open access
scholarly research journal on Biodiversity. under the affiliation of the International
Network For Natural Sciences | INNSpub. an open access multidisciplinary
research journal publisher.
Abstract
Ecological restoration
is considered like the practical and sustainable management option for degraded
mangroves. The ecological status of reforested mangrove areas (RMAs) in
Douala-Edea National Park (DENP) is not well understood, despite extensive
restoration projects. This study aims to estimate standing biomass and
litterfall production in three RMAs located in Bolondo and Yoyo II. In each RMA
and it natural vegetation, five 10m × 10m permanent sampling plots (PSPs) were
established. Thirty PSPs were established equally in RMAs and natural
vegetation. Height and diameter measurements were recorded, and allometric equations were used to estimate above-ground biomass (AGB) and below-ground
biomass (BGB). In addition, 150 litter traps (1m × 1m) were evenly distributed
across the PSPs to collect monthly litterfall, which was dried, sorted, and
weighed. Mean abundances, diameters, and heights were: 4000±200 ind./ha,
1.2±0.5 cm, and 1.8±0.3 m; 3280±238.74 ind./ha, 2.58±0.85 cm, and 5.64±1.87 m;
2160±240.83 ind./ha, 2.93±1.4 cm, and 3.34±1.26 m for 3-year, 6-year and
11-year RMAs respectively. AGB, BGB, and annual litterfall biomass were:
11.98±0.76 kg/ha, 13.88±1.3 kg/ha, and 40.78±7.42 g/m²/year for 3-year RMAs;
61.18±2.16 kg/ha, 55.19±1.92 kg/ha, and 397.75±75.79 g/m²/year for 6-year RMAs;
and 55.25±2.93 kg/ha, 47.8±1.31 kg/ha, and 576.23±106.75 g/m²/year for 11-year
RMAs, respectively. These values correspond to approximately 12.31±2.19,
52.08±1.6, and 46.26±1.1 kgC/ha of total carbon sink and 18.27±3.48,
179.09±4.44, and 259.3±8.89 kgC/ha/year of total annual litterfall carbon sink.
Although 6-year RMAs showed higher AGB and BGB than natural vegetation, the
values remained lower overall. In contrast, 11-year RMAs exhibited higher
annual litterfall production, indicating progress towards ecological balance.
Introduction
Globally, mangroves cover an area of 137,000 km² (Spalding and Leal, 2021). These tropical coastal forest ecosystems are renowned for their high biomass productivity and carbon sequestration capacity (Alongi, 2011; Chowdhury et al., 2023). On average, a minimally disturbed mangrove sequesters 1087±584 MgC/ha (Sasmito et al., 2020). The conservation of mangroves is crucial for the wellbeing of local human communities and the fight against global warming (Din et al., 2016; Kathiresan et al., 2021).
However, mangroves are under threat from both natural and human-induced pressures, leading to a reduction in vegetation cover (Golberg et al., 2020; Emanè et al., 2021). Between 1996 and 2016, the rate of deforestation of mangroves was estimated at 4.3 % (Spalding and Leal, 2021). During the period of 2000- 2012, almost 1646 km² of the world's mangrove area disappeared. Along its western Atlantic coast, Cameroon has 1113 km² of mangroves (Hamilton and Casey, 2016). Over the last two decades, these mangroves have been subject to increased anthropisation, which has led to a considerable decrease in vegetation cover (Din et al., 2017). The mangroves in Douala-Edea National Park (DENP) are also affected by this issue. According to Ajonina and Usongo (2001), the annual regression rate of these mangroves was estimated to be 53 ha before 2000. Similarly, Findi and Wantim (2022) observed a regression rate of 58.38 % between 2011 and 2015 using satellite image analysis. For at least three decades, these mangroves have been the primary source of firewood used for smoking fish in various fishing camps and surrounding households (Ajonina, 2008).
In response to this ecological disaster, various options for mangrove conservation have been implemented worldwide, including restoration. Mangrove restoration refers to a set of human actions aimed at re-establishing ecological processes that accelerate the recovery of forest structure, ecological functioning, and biodiversity to levels typical of climax forest (Elliott et al., 2013). According to Worthington and Spalding (2018), over 190,147 km² of mangroves were restored globally by 2018. In Central Africa, Ajonina et al. (2016) reported that over 500 ha of degraded mangroves were reforested before 2017. Reforestation of degraded mangroves in Cameroon officially began in 2009 and continues to this day. In 2023, Planète-Urgence’s NGO implemented the planting of 40,000 seedlings in the mangroves of Bolondo fishing camp village located in DENP, with the involvement of governmental organizations and other partners (Planète-Urgence, 2023).
Mangrove restoration projects face numerous obstacles worldwide, often resulting in partial or complete failure (López-Portillo et al., 2017; Worthington and Spalding, 2018; Ellison et al., 2020; Lhosupasirirat et al., 2023). These failures not only cause ecological damage but also result in significant financial losses, with the average cost of restoring one hectare in Central Africa estimated at US$ 3200 (Ajonina et al., 2016). Lee et al. (2019) identified the absence of a comprehensive database for monitoring and assessment restoration projects as a major obstacle to mangrove restoration efforts.
There is a lack of information on the structure and functioning of
restored mangrove areas along the African Atlantic coast (Zabbey and Tanee,
2016). To our knowledge, in Cameroon, there is only one specific study on
mangrove restoration which is limited to determining the main abiotic factors
that influence the growth of seedlings in nurseries (Boubakary et al., 2019).
No published scientific study has yet been conducted on the monitoring and
assessment of standing biomass and litterfall production of reforested mangrove
areas in the DENP. However, quantifying the biomass of reforested areas would
be crucial for safeguarding mangroves in the DENP and for improving climate
change mitigation strategies (Malik et al., 2020). Furthermore, it is essential
to incorporate the monitoring of objectively verifiable indicators of ecosystem
functioning, such as litterfall production Globally, mangroves cover an area of
137,000 km² (Spalding and Leal, 2021). These tropical coastal forest ecosystems
are renowned for their high biomass productivity and carbon sequestration
capacity (Alongi, 2011; Chowdhury et al., 2023). On average, a minimally
disturbed mangrove sequesters 1087±584 MgC/ha (Sasmito et al., 2020). The
conservation of mangroves is crucial for the wellbeing of local human
communities and the fight against global warming (Din et al., 2016; Kathiresan
et al., 2021). However, mangroves are under threat from both natural and
human-induced pressures, leading to a reduction in vegetation cover (Golberg et
al., 2020; Emanè et al., 2021). Between 1996 and 2016, the rate of
deforestation of mangroves was estimated at 4.3 % (Spalding and Leal, 2021).
During the period of 2000- 2012, almost 1646 km² of the world's mangrove area
disappeared. Along its western Atlantic coast, Cameroon has 1113 km² of
mangroves (Hamilton and Casey, 2016). Over the last two decades, these
mangroves have been subject to increased anthropisation, which has led to a
considerable decrease in vegetation cover (Din et al., 2017). The mangroves in
Douala-Edea National Park (DENP) are also affected by this issue. According to
Ajonina and Usongo (2001), the annual regression rate of these mangroves was
estimated to be 53 ha before 2000. Similarly, Findi and Wantim (2022) observed
a regression rate of 58.38 % between 2011 and 2015 using satellite image
analysis. For at least three decades, these mangroves have been the primary
source of firewood used for smoking fish in various fishing camps and
surrounding households (Ajonina, 2008). In response to this ecological
disaster, various options for mangrove conservation have been implemented
worldwide, including restoration. Mangrove restoration refers to a set of human
actions aimed at re-establishing ecological processes that accelerate the
recovery of forest structure, ecological functioning, and biodiversity to
levels typical of climax forest (Elliott et al., 2013). According to
Worthington and Spalding (2018), over 190,147 km² of mangroves were restored
globally by 2018. In Central Africa, Ajonina et al. (2016) reported that over
500 ha of degraded mangroves were reforested before 2017. Reforestation of
degraded mangroves in Cameroon officially began in 2009 and continues to this
day. In 2023, Planète-Urgence’s NGO implemented the planting of 40,000
seedlings in the mangroves of Bolondo fishing camp village located in DENP,
with the involvement of governmental organizations and other partners
(Planète-Urgence, 2023). Mangrove restoration projects face numerous obstacles
worldwide, often resulting in partial or complete failure (López-Portillo et
al., 2017; Worthington and Spalding, 2018; Ellison et al., 2020; Lhosupasirirat
et al., 2023). These failures not only cause ecological damage but also result
in significant financial losses, with the average cost of restoring one hectare
in Central Africa estimated at US$ 3200 (Ajonina et al., 2016). Lee et al.
(2019) identified the absence of a comprehensive database for monitoring and
assessment restoration projects as a major obstacle to mangrove restoration
efforts. There is a lack of information on the structure and functioning of
restored mangrove areas along the African Atlantic coast (Zabbey and Tanee,
2016). To our knowledge, in Cameroon, there is only one specific study on
mangrove restoration which is limited to determining the main abiotic factors
that influence the growth of seedlings in nurseries (Boubakary et al., 2019).
No published scientific study has yet been conducted on the monitoring and
assessment of standing biomass and litterfall production of reforested mangrove
areas in the DENP. However, quantifying the biomass of reforested areas would
be crucial for safeguarding mangroves in the DENP and for improving climate
change mitigation strategies (Malik et al., 2020). Furthermore, it is essential
to incorporate the monitoring of objectively verifiable indicators of ecosystem
functioning, such as litterfall production
Reference
Ajonina GN, Usongo
L. 2001. Preliminary Quantitative Impact Assessment of Wood Extraction on
the Mangroves of Douala-Edea Forest Reserve, Cameroon. Tropical
Biodiversity 7, 137–149. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313056745
Ajonina GN. 2008.
Inventory and Modelling Mangrove Forest Stand Dynamics Following Different
Levels of Wood Exploitation Pressures in the Douala-Edea Atlantic Coast of
Cameroon, Central Africa. PhD thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Germany, 215.
Ajonina G, Chuyong
G. 2011. Vulnerability assessment of mangrove forest stands from anthropogenic
wood exploitation pressures and sea level rise impacts following a re-census
survey and analysis of eight years old permanent sample plots in the
Douala-Edea Estuary, Cameroon. Technical Report, 1-27. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36502.24644
Ajonina GN, Aya FA,
Diame A, Armah AK, Camara S, Amegankpoe C, Zabbey N, Kaya P. 2016.
Overview of Experience of Mangrove Reforestation in West and Central Africa. In
Ogunsanwo OY, Akinwole AO, eds., 38th Annual Conference of FAN. Forestry
Association of Nigeria 17, 12-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314243276
Alongi DM. 2011.
Carbon Payments for Mangrove Conservation: Ecosystem Constraints and
Uncertainties of Sequestration Potential. Environmental Sciences Policy 14, 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.004
Bosire JO,
Dahdouh-Guebas F, Walton M, Crona BI, Lewis RR, Field CD, Kairo JG, Koedam N. 2008.
Functionality of Restored Mangroves: A review. Aquatic Botany 89,
251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.03.010
Bosire JO, Kairo JG,
Wartel S, Kazungu J, Koedam N. 2006. Success Rates of Recruited Tree
Species and their Contribution to the Structural Development of Reforested
Mangrove Stands. Marine Ecology Progress Series 325, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps325085
Boubakary, Essomè-Koum,
GL, Nyamsi-Moussian L, Konango-Samè A, Kottè-Mapoko EF, Motto IS, Massako F,
Din N. 2019. Mangrove Ecosystems Rehabilitation in Cameroon: Effects of
Two Abiotic Factors on the Growth of Rhizophora Seedlings. Journal of
Marine Biology and Environmental Sciences 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36266/JMBES/101
Chowdhury A, Naz A,
Maiti SK. 2023. Variations in Soil Blue Carbon Sequestration between
Natural Mangrove Metapopulations and a Mixed Mangrove Plantation: A Case Study
from the World’s Largest Contiguous Mangrove Forest. Life 13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020271
Dahdouh-Guebas F,
Cannicci S. 2021. Mangrove Restoration Under Shifted Baselines and Future
Uncertainty. Frontier in Marine Science 8, 8-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.799543
Din N, Ngo-Massou VM,
Essomè-Koum GL, Ndema-Nsombo E, Kottè-Mapoko E, Nyamsi-Moussian L. 2017.
Impact of Urbanization on the Evolution of Mangrove Ecosystems in the Wouri
River Estuary (Douala Cameroon). In Finkl CW, Makowski C Ed. Coastal Wetlands :
Alteration and Remediation. Coastal Research Library, Springer 8, 81–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56179-0
Din N, Ngo-Massou VM,
Essomè-Koum GL, Kottè-Mapoko EF, Emane JM, Akongnwi AD, Tchoffo R. 2016.
Local Perception of Climate Change and Adaptation in Mangrove Areas of the
Cameroon Coast. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 608–618.
Elliott S, Blakesley D,
Hardwick K. 2013. Restauration des Forêts Tropicales: un guide pratique.
Sonne N Ed. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew, 344. https://www.forru.org/sites/default/files/public/publications/resources/forru-0000152-0003.pdf
Ellison AM, Felson AJ,
Friess DA. 2020. Mangrove Rehabilitation and Restoration as Experimental
Adaptive Management. Frontier in Marine Science 7, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00327
Emanè JM, Essomè-Koum
GL, Ngotta-Biyon J, Ekodeck, GE, Tomedi-Eyango M, Din N. 2021. Effects of
Anthropogenic Pressures on the Structure of Floristic Components of Mangroves in
the Cameroon Estuary. Examines in Marine Biology and Oceanography 4,
1–7. https://doi.org/10.31031/EIMBO.2021.04.00057
Ferreira AC, Ganade G,
Jose Luiz de Attayde. 2015. Restoration Versus Natural Regeneration in a
Neotropical Mangrove : Effects on Plant Biomass and Crab Communities. Ocean and
Coastal Management Journal 110, 2002-2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.03.006
Findi EN, Wantim MN. 2022.
Using Remote Sensing and GIS to Evaluate Mangrove Forest Dynamics in
Douala-Edea Reserve, Cameroon. Journal of Materials and Environmental
Science 13, 222–235.
Fromard F, Puig H,
Mougin E, Marty G, Betoulle JL, Cadamuro L. 1998. Structure, Above-Ground
Biomass and Dynamics of Mangrove Ecosystems: New Data from French Guiana.
Oecologia 115, 39-53.
Goldberg L, Lagomasino,
D, Thomas, N. 2020. Global Declines in Human‐driven Mangrove Loss. Global
Change Biology. 26, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15275
Hamilton SE, Casey D.
2016. Creation of a High Spatio-Temporal Resolution Global Database of
Continuous Mangrove Forest Cover for the 21st Century (CGMFC-21). Global
Ecology Biogeography 25, 729-738. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12449
Hieu PV, Dung LP, Tue
NT, Omori K. 2017. Will Restored Mangrove Forests Enhance Sediment Organic
Carbon and Ecosystem Carbon Storage. Regional Studies in Marine Science https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2017.05.003
Kairo JG, Lang’at JKS,
Dahdouh-Guebas F, Bosire JO, Karachi M. 2008. Structural Development and
Productivity of Replanted Mangrove Plantations in Kenya. Forest Ecology and
Management 255, 2670-2677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.031
Kamruzzaman M, Osawa A,
Deshar R, Sharma S, Mouctar K. 2017. Species Composition, Biomass, and Net
Primary Productivity of Mangrove Forest in Okukubi River, Okinawa Island,
Japan. Regional Studies in Marine Science 12, 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2017.03.004
Kamruzzaman M, Kalayan
B, Sumonta PK, Ahmed S, Osawa A. 2019. Litterfall Production,
Decomposition and Nutrient Accumulation in Sundarbans Mangrove Forests,
Bangladesh. Forest Science and Technology, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2018.1557566
Kathiresan K. 2021. Mangroves:
Types and Importance. In Rastogi RP, Gupta DK, Phulwaria M, Ed. Mangroves:
Ecology, Biodiversity and Manegement, Springer, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2494-0
Kauffman JB, Donato DC. 2012.
Protocols for the Measurement, Monitoring and Reporting of Structure, Biomass
and Carbon Stocks in Mangrove Forests. Working Paper 86. CIFOR, Bogor,
Indonesia, 1-40. www.cifor.org
Komiyama A, Jin O,
Poungparn S. 2008. Allometry, Biomass and Productivity of Mangrove
Forests : A Review. Aquatic Botany 2094, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.006
Lee SY, Hamilton S,
Barbier EB, Primavera J, Lewis RR. 2019. Better Restoration Policies Are
Needed to Conserve Mangrove Ecosystems. Nature Ecology and Evolution 3,
870-872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0861-y
Lhosupasirirat P,
Dahdouh-Guebas F, Hugé J, Wodehouse D, Enright J. 2023. Young Voices
and Visions for the Stakeholder Perceptions on Community-Based Ecological
Mangrove Restoration (CBEMR): a Case Study in Thailand. Society for Ecological
Restoration 31, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13894
López-Portillo J, Lewis
RRI, Shing VHR, Lee Y. 2017. Mangrove Ecosystems : A Global Biogeographic
Perspective Structure, Function, and Services. In Rivera-Monroy VH, Lee SY,
Kristensen E, Twilley RR Ed. Mangrove Ecosystems: A Global Biogeographic
Perspective: Structure, Function, and Services, 301–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62206-4
Malik A, Jalil AR,
Arifuddin A, Syahmuddin A. 2020. Biomass Carbon Stocks in the Mangrove
Rehabilitated Area of Sinjai District, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Geography,
Environment, Sustainability 2012, 32–38. https://DOI-10.24057/2071-9388-2019-131
Mchenga ISS, Ali AI.
2017. Mangrove Litter Production and Seasonality of Dominant Species in
Zanzibar, Tanzania. Journal of East African Natural History 106, 5-18. https://doi.org/https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jeanh/article/view/162370/151879
Monga E, Mangora MM,
Trettin CC. 2022. Impact of Mangrove Planting on Forest Biomass Carbon and
other Structural Attributes in the Rufiji Delta, Tanzania. Global Ecology and
Conservation 35, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02100
Ngo-Massou VM, Kenne M,
Dongmo AB. 2016. Effect of Anthropogenic Activities on Mangrove Crab
Diversity in Cameroon Atlantic Coast. International Journal of Research Studies
in Biosciences 4, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0365.0404001
Ntyam OCS, Armah AK,
Ajonina GN, Wiafe G, Adomako J, Nyarko E, Obiang BO. 2014. Importance of
Mangrove Litter Production in the Protection of Atlantic Coastal Forest of
Cameroon and Ghana. In The Land/Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone of West
and Central Africa, Estuaries of the World, Diop S, Barusseau JP, Descamps C.
Ed. Springer International, 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06388-1
Planète-Urgence. 2023. Projet
Cameroon Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration and Resilience. Web page available
by: https://planete-urgence.org/en/projet-camerr-cameroon-mangrove-ecosystem-restoration-and-resilience/
Pradisty NA, Sidik F,
Bimantara Y, Susetya IE, Basyuni M. 2022. Litterfall and Associated
Macrozoobenthic of Restored Mangrove Forests in Abandoned Aquaculture Ponds.
Sustainability 14, 2-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138082
Sasmito SD, Sillanpää
M, Hayes MA, Bachri S, Saragi-Sasmito MF, Sidik F, Hanggara B, Mofu WY, Rumbiak
VIR, Hendri, Taberima S, Suhaemi, Nugroho JD, Pattiasina TF, Widagti N,
Barakalla, Rahajoe JS, Hartantri H, Nikijuluw V, Jowey RN, Heatubun CD,
Ermgassen P, Worthington T, Howard J, Lovelock CE, Friess DA, Hutley LB,
Murdiyarso D. 2020. Mangrove Blue Carbon Stocks and Dynamics are
Controlled by Hydrogeomorphic Settings and Land-Use Change. Global Change
Biology, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15056
Spalding M, Leal M. 2021.
The State of the World’s Mangroves 2021 (M. Spalding and M. Leal Ed. Global
Mangrove Alliance. https://doi.org/www.mangrovealliance.org
Wang’ondu VW, Bosire
JO, Kairo JG, Kinyamario JI, Mwaura FB, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Koedam N. 2014.
Litterfall Dynamics of Restored Mangroves (Rhizophora mucronata Lamk.
and Sonneratia alba Sm.) in Kenya. Restoration Ecology 22, 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12149
Worthington T, Spalding
M. 2018. Mangrove Restoration Potential: A Global Map Highlighting a Critical
Opportunity (UICN (ed.)). UICN, University of Cambridge, The Nature
Conservancy, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.17863
/CAM.39153
Zabbey N, Tanee FBG. 2016.
Assessment of Asymmetric Mangrove Restoration Trials in Ogoniland, Niger Delta,
Nigeria: Lessons for Future Intervention, 245–257.