Urban Noise and Bird Diversity: COVID-19 Lockdown Impact | InformativeBD

 

Garima Tiwari and Fergus Mark Anthony from the different institute of the india wrote a research article about Urban Noise and Bird Diversity: COVID-19 Lockdown Impact, entitled, "Anthropogenic noise reduces bird species richness and diversity along a Rur-urban gradient: A case study from a city in central India during nationwide lockdown amid COVID-19" This research paper published by the  Journal Of Biodiversity and Environmental Science |JBES an open scholarly research journal on Biodiversity, under the affiliation of the International Network For Natural Science |INNSpub an open access multidiciplinary research publisher.

Abstract:

Urbanization is increasing rapidly in all parts of the world to accommodate the increasing human population but it is having a drastic effect on native flora and fauna. The present study was carried out across a three stage urbanization gradient in and around the city of Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Observations were made from September 2019 to February 2021 at the selected three sites during COVID 19 pandemic. Point count method was used for bird surveys and Sound pressure (Noise) measurements were made across the three selected sites. The Avian diversity was measured by total species richness, Fisher’s alpha diversity index and Shannon-Wiener diversity index. The Urban centre recorded the highest sound pressure and lowest Avian species richness but as we moved away from the urban centre the noise levels reduced and the avain species richness increased towards the rural areas. This is mainly due to many avian species avoiding urban areas because of increasing noise levels. We also found that the urban bird community is dominated by a few species whereas the rural bird community was much more diverse.

Read more: Assessing Lead and Arsenic in Natural MosquitoRepellents | InformativeBD

Introduction

As the current world population keeps growing at a rapid rate, accompanied Parallelly by urbanisation more and more local biodiversity is being affected. A very few studies have been carried out to study the consequences of Urbanization on birds (Sengupta et al., 2014) Earlier studies showed a high bird abundance in Indian cities which could be because of the food availability, vegetative cover and the Indian virtue of generosity towards all living forms (Galushin 1971). The past studies on Urban birds across the Indian subcontinent have shown a rich species diversity where 125 bird species were recorded in the urbanized habitats of Pauri District, Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand State, 88 species on the Amravati University Campus and 76 species were recorded on a campus of the Punjabi University, Pakistan (Nathani et al., 2012; Wadatkar 2001). But the most recent study from Kolkata, however, recorded only 48 bird species across different urban habitats where the higher species richness was towards the rural areas and species richness went down as they approached the city centre (Sengupta et al., 2014).

Urban habitats are quite different from the natural areas, due to which the species dwelling in these areas face higher competition with exotic species, higher risk of predation and parasites, as well as stress due to chemical pollution and noise (Jokimäki 1999; Slabbekoorn 2008). Noise pollution in cities is a relatively recent phenomenon that birds now have to cope up with throughout much of the world. Whether a given avian species will be a “winner” (urban-adapted or urban-exploiter species) or “loser” (urban-avoiding species) is determined by an interaction between land use and life history traits of that particular species (McKinney et al., 1999). Noise induced changes on birds include stress, flight, changes in foraging, louder calls and other reactions based on physical observations. This can ultimately result in permanent hearing loss in avian populations (Niemiec et al., 1994). Loud sounds from urban sources like industries, vehicular traffic etc. damages sensory organs of birds as well as affect their reproductive success. Traffic noise had a negative effect on reproductive success on great tits (Parus major) with females laying smaller clutches in noisier areas (Halfwerk et al., 2011). The urban avian community is greatly influenced by the land use changes and the life history traits of selected species as to whether they will adapt to the urban scenario or end up avoiding the habitat (Blair 2001).

Vehicles contribute the majority towards urban noise (Zannin et al., 2002; Perillo et al., 2017). Vehicular noise affects bird distributions, reducing density, richness and abundance in sites where noise pollution is intense (Rheindt 2003; Arévalo et al., 2011; mc Clure et al., 2013). Increased Noise Pollution has resulted in birds having to make louder calls.

Vocalization in birds is governed by Energy costs and body size in order to increase their amplitude to rise above background noise (Brackenbury 1979; Brumm 2004; Oberweger et al., 2001). Sexual selection and social integration is birds is based on acoustic communication (Catchpole et al., 2003). If birds must change their vocalization it might affects many facets of their life causing immense stress on them.

The present study was carried out with an aim to study the impact of increasing sound pressure (Noise) in urban areas on birds. Noise pollution has become a major problem in today world as human population is increases. Birds being a visible part of the ecosystem help in providing information on the overall condition like quality and changes in the environment as well as community composition therefore they are called as ecosystem health indicators. Such studies can help to predict the effect of anthropogenic noise in the current scenario.

Reference: 

Arévalo JE, Newhard K. 2011. Traffic noise affects forest bird species in a protected tropical forest. Revista de Biología Tropical 59(2), 969-980.

Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hillis DM, Hill DA, Mustoe S. 2000. Bird census techniques. Elsevier.

Blair RB, Launer AE. 1997. Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological conservation 80(1), 113-125.

Blair RB. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological applications 6(2), 506-519.

Blair RB. 2001. Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States: is urbanization creating a homogeneous fauna? In Biotic homogenization (pp. 33-56). Springer, Boston, MA.

Brackenbury JH. 1979. Power capabilities of the avian sound-producing system. Journal of Experimental Biology 78(1), 163-166.

Brumm H. 2004. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of animal ecology 73(3), 434-440.

Catchpole CK, Slater PJ. 2003. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge university press.

Census of India. 2011. Population Statistics. Directorate of Census Operations in Chhattisgarh, Census of India 2011.

De Moura LN, Vielliard JM, Da Silva ML. 2010. Seasonal fluctuation of the Orange-winged Amazon at a roosting site in Amazonia. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122(1), 88-94.

Galushin VM. 1971. A huge urban population of birds of prey in Delhi India. Ibis 113(4), 522-522.

Garaffa PI, Filloy J, Bellocq MI. 2009. Bird community responses along urban–rural gradients: Does the size of the urbanized area matter. Landscape and Urban Planning 90(1-2), 33-41.

Halfwerk W, Holleman LJ, Lessells CKM, Slabbekoorn H. 2011. Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. Journal of applied Ecology, 48(1), 210-219.

Hunter P. 2007. The human impact on biological diversity: How species adapt to urban challenges sheds light on evolution and provides clues about conservation. EMBO reports 8(4), 316-318.

Jennings V, Larson L, Yun J. 2016. Advancing sustainability through urban green space: Cultural ecosystem services, equity, and social determinants of health. International Journal of environmental research and public health 13(2), 196.

Jokimäki J. 1999. Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scale variables. Urban Ecosystems 3(1), 21-34.

Kale M, Ferrante M, Dudhe N, Kasambe R, Trukhanova IS, Ivanova T, Lövei GL. 2018. Nestedness of bird assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Central India. Journal of Urban Ecology 4(1), juy 017.

Konadath S, Mahadeva A, Chatni S. 2019. Noise measurement across different land-use patterns. Journal of Indian Speech Language & Hearing Association 33(2), 55.

Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R. 2001. A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms, and approaches. In Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world (pp. 1-17). Springer, Boston, MA.

McClure CJ, Ware HE, Carlisle J, Kaltenecker G, Barber JR. 2013. An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280(1773), 20132290.

McKinney ML, Lockwood JL. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in ecology & evolution 14(11), 450-453.

McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, Biodiversity, and ConservationThe impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience 52(10), 883-890.

Mohring B, Henry PY, Jiguet F, Malher F, Angelier F. 2021. Investigating temporal and spatial correlates of the sharp decline of an urban exploiter bird in a large European city. Urban Ecosystems 24(3), 501-513.

Naithani A, Bhatt D. 2012. Bird community structure in natural and urbanized habitats along an altitudinal gradient in Pauri district (Garhwal Himalaya) of Uttarakhand state, India. Biologia 67(4), 800-808.

Niemiec AJ, Raphael Y, Moody DB. 1994. Return of auditory function following structural regeneration after acoustic trauma: behavioural measures from quail. Hearing research 79(1-2), 1-16.

Oberweger K, Goller F. 2001. The metabolic cost of birdsong production. Journal of Experimental Biology 204(19), 3379-3388.

Ortega CP. 2012. Chapter 2: Effects of noise pollution on birds: A brief review of our knowledge. Ornithological monographs 74(1), 6-22.

Pauchard A, Aguayo M, Peña E, Urrutia R. 2006. Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biological conservation 127(3), 272-281.

Perillo A, Mazzoni L G, Passos LF, Goulart VD, Duca C, Young RJ. 2017. Anthropogenic noise reduces bird species richness and diversity in urban parks. Ibis 159(3), 638-646.

Ramaiah M, Avtar R. 2019. Urban green spaces and their need in cities of rapidly urbanizing India: A review. Urban Science 3(3), 94.

Rheindt FE. 2003. The impact of roads on birds: does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution. Journal für Ornithologie 144(3), 295-306.

Sengupta S, Mondal M, Basu P. 2014. Bird species assemblages across a rural urban gradient around Kolkata, India. Urban Ecosystems 17(2), 585-596.

Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester EAP. 2008. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Molecular ecology 17(1), 72-83.

Summers-Smith JD. 2003. The decline of the House Sparrow: a review. British Birds 96(9), 439-446.

Turrini T, Knop E. 2015. A landscape ecology approach identifies important drivers of urban biodiversity. Global change biology 21(4), 1652-1667.

Vishwakarma A, Anthony FM, Tiwari S, Choubey S. 2021. Avifaunal Diversity of Winter Season in Kopra Reservoir of Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India. In Proceedings of the Zoological Society (Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 118-126). Springer India.

Viswanath S, Nair PKR, Kaushik PK, Prakasam U. 2000. Acacia nilotica trees in rice fields: A traditional agroforestry system in central India. Agroforestry systems 50(2), 157-177.

Wadatkar JS. 2001. Checklist of birds from Amravati University Campus, Maharashtra. Zoos’ Print Journal 16(5), 497-499.

Zannin PH, Diniz FB, Barbosa WA. 2002. ‘‘Environmental noise pollution in the city of Curitiba, Brazil,’’ Applied Acoustics 63, 351-358.

 Source: Anthropogenic noise reduces bird species richness and diversity along a Rur-urban gradient: A case study from a city in central India during nationwide lockdown amid COVID-19